On July 26, 2018 7:33:30 PM PDT, Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz> wrote:
>On Thu, Jul 26, 2018 at 06:53:06PM -0700, Andres Freund wrote:
>> If we were to remove it, it'd obviously be a drawn out affair, given
>> that we likely couldn't drop it from the restore side immediately...
>
>The maintenance load is not high as well
Yea, I mentioned that. Worthwhile to note that it's nor pretty code.
>, so I see no real point in
>removing it, and that it would likely make people using it unhappy.
Because others have to figure out what the format is when looking at pg-dump. And might choose wrongly. That's a cost
aswell.
Andres
--
Sent from my Android device with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity.
