Re: Re: pgsql: Default to hidden visibility for extension libraries where possi - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: Re: pgsql: Default to hidden visibility for extension libraries where possi
Date
Msg-id 1698214.1658326555@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: pgsql: Default to hidden visibility for extension libraries where possi  (Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>)
List pgsql-hackers
Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> writes:
> On July 20, 2022 3:54:03 PM GMT+02:00, Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> wrote:
>> The name PGDLLEXPORT is actually slightly misleading, now, because
>> there's no longer anything about it that is specific to DLLs.

> How so? Right now it's solely used for making symbols in DLLs as exported?

I suspect Robert is reading "DLL" as meaning only a Windows thing.
You're right, if you read it as a generic term for loadable libraries,
it's more or less applicable everywhere.

            regards, tom lane



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Aleksander Alekseev
Date:
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Improve amcheck to also check UNIQUE constraint in btree index.
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: pgsql: Default to hidden visibility for extension libraries where possi