Re: BUG #1518: Conversions to (undocumented) SQL year-month and - Mailing list pgsql-bugs

From Roy Badami
Subject Re: BUG #1518: Conversions to (undocumented) SQL year-month and
Date
Msg-id 16961.62306.731158.792599@giles.gnomon.org.uk
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: BUG #1518: Conversions to (undocumented) SQL year-month and  (Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>)
List pgsql-bugs
Bruce> o Interpret INTERVAL '1 year' MONTH as

I'm still not convinced that allowing this doesn't just create
unnecessary confusion.  How about:

  o Decide whether constructs such as INTERVAL '1 year' MONTH should
    be allowed, and if so what they should mean, eg perhaps CAST
    (INTERVAL '1 year' AS INTERVAL MONTH)

pgsql-bugs by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: BUG #1518: Conversions to (undocumented) SQL year-month and
Next
From: Roy Badami
Date:
Subject: Re: BUG #1518: Conversions to (undocumented) SQL year-month