Re: BUG #1517: SQL interval syntax is accepted by the parser, - Mailing list pgsql-bugs

From Roy Badami
Subject Re: BUG #1517: SQL interval syntax is accepted by the parser,
Date
Msg-id 16961.59455.19100.851700@giles.gnomon.org.uk
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: BUG #1517: SQL interval syntax is accepted by the parser,  (Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>)
Responses Re: BUG #1517: SQL interval syntax is accepted by the parser,  (Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>)
List pgsql-bugs
Bruce> This is going to be a backward compatibility problem, but
    Bruce> to support ANSI syntax we are going to need to do this.

Given the existence of the INTERVAL '1' MONTH etc syntax is completely
undocumented, I doubt it's a major problem.

(Actually, INTERVAL '1' and INTERVAL '1:30' are undocumented, too, but
it's probably more likely that people are relying on that).

     -roy

pgsql-bugs by date:

Previous
From: Bruce Momjian
Date:
Subject: Re: BUG #1518: Conversions to (undocumented) SQL year-month and
Next
From: Roy Badami
Date:
Subject: Re: BUG #1518: Conversions to (undocumented) SQL year-month and