Re: point -> double,double ? - Mailing list pgsql-general

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: point -> double,double ?
Date
Msg-id 16941.1042834806@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: point -> double,double ?  (Greg Stark <gsstark@mit.edu>)
Responses Re: point -> double,double ?
List pgsql-general
Greg Stark <gsstark@mit.edu> writes:
> Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> writes:
>> point[0] and point[1].  Not sure if this is adequately documented.

> Thank you very much.

> It may also be that I just don't have the right book. The book I have seems to
> be more of a tutorial than a reference. Is there a recommended reference book
> for postgres?

Book?  Save a tree, use the online manuals ;-).  I find this particular
item documented at the bottom of

http://www.ca.postgresql.org/users-lounge/docs/7.3/postgres/functions-geometry.html

            regards, tom lane

pgsql-general by date:

Previous
From: Dennis Gearon
Date:
Subject: Constraint of only one legal value for a foreign key
Next
From: Jan Wieck
Date:
Subject: Re: double precision to numeric overflow error