Re: Add on_perl_init and proper destruction to plperl [PATCH] - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: Add on_perl_init and proper destruction to plperl [PATCH]
Date
Msg-id 16929.1264636443@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Add on_perl_init and proper destruction to plperl [PATCH]  ("David E. Wheeler" <david@kineticode.com>)
Responses Re: Add on_perl_init and proper destruction to plperl [PATCH]
List pgsql-hackers
"David E. Wheeler" <david@kineticode.com> writes:
> On Jan 27, 2010, at 3:33 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
>> I don't have to read any further than the place where it says "doesn't
>> work if you call both plperl and plperlu" to realize that that's quite
>> false.  Maybe we have different definitions of what a software
>> interaction is...

> I think that dates from when plperl and plperlu couldn't co-exists, which was fixed a few months ago, n'est pas?

No, that was fixed years ago, at least if you have a modern Perl build
that supports multiplicity at all.
        regards, tom lane


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: "David E. Wheeler"
Date:
Subject: Re: Add on_perl_init and proper destruction to plperl [PATCH]
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: Add on_perl_init and proper destruction to plperl [PATCH]