Dean Rasheed <dean.a.rasheed@googlemail.com> writes:
> 2009/7/29 Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>:
>> � For non-unique indexes, it is not required that <function>aminsert</>
>> � do anything; it might for instance refuse to index NULLs.
> Doesn't this comment apply equally to unique indexes?
Hmm, I was thinking that a unique-capable index would have to index all
tuples. But I guess if it's restricted to one index column (like hash)
it could omit nulls and still enforce uniqueness correctly. I'll change
that comment.
regards, tom lane
