Postgres Pro
Downloads
Home   >   mailing lists

Re: postgres_fdw vs. force_parallel_mode on ppc - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: postgres_fdw vs. force_parallel_mode on ppc
Date
Msg-id 16878.1455584235@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: postgres_fdw vs. force_parallel_mode on ppc  (Noah Misch <noah@leadboat.com>)
Responses Re: postgres_fdw vs. force_parallel_mode on ppc
List pgsql-hackers
Tree view 
Noah Misch <noah@leadboat.com> writes:
> On Mon, Feb 15, 2016 at 07:31:40PM -0500, Robert Haas wrote:
>> Oh, crap.  I didn't realize that TEMP_CONFIG didn't affect the contrib
>> test suites.  Is there any reason for that, or is it just kinda where
>> we ended up?

> To my knowledge, it's just the undesirable place we ended up.

Yeah.  +1 for fixing that, if it's not unreasonably painful.
        regards, tom lane

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Introduce group locking to prevent parallel processes from deadl
Next
From: Greg Stark
Date:
Subject: Re: A bit of PG archeology uncovers an interesting Linux/Unix factoid