Re: Creation of wiki page for open items of v11 - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: Creation of wiki page for open items of v11
Date
Msg-id 16875.1523458408@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Creation of wiki page for open items of v11  (Ashutosh Bapat <ashutosh.bapat@enterprisedb.com>)
Responses Re: Creation of wiki page for open items of v11  (Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>)
Re: Creation of wiki page for open items of v11  (Peter Eisentraut <peter.eisentraut@2ndquadrant.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
Ashutosh Bapat <ashutosh.bapat@enterprisedb.com> writes:
> On Wed, Apr 11, 2018 at 6:53 PM, Peter Eisentraut
> <peter.eisentraut@2ndquadrant.com> wrote:
>> Do people find it useful to move the resolved items to a separate
>> section on the page, instead of just removing them?  I'm not sure that
>> the resolved sections are useful, compared to just using the git log.

> If we have a section for resolved items, we can keep track of all
> items. If we just delete the resolved items, we wouldn't know if it
> was a mistake or it was intentional removal.

It's not that much work to move the items rather than remove them,
so I'd vote for keeping up the practice.  It has some value in terms
of tracking activity.

What *does* take time is adding a link to the commit, so I'd happily
drop that step.  As Peter says, you can usually look in the commit
log if you care.

            regards, tom lane


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: Bugs in TOAST handling, OID assignment and redo recovery
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: 'make check' fails