Re: [pgsql-www] Collaboration Tool Proposal - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: [pgsql-www] Collaboration Tool Proposal
Date
Msg-id 16841.1077859531@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [pgsql-www] Collaboration Tool Proposal  (Neil Conway <neilc@samurai.com>)
Responses Re: [pgsql-www] Collaboration Tool Proposal  (Josh Berkus <josh@agliodbs.com>)
Re: [pgsql-www] Collaboration Tool Proposal  (Greg Stark <gsstark@mit.edu>)
List pgsql-hackers
Neil Conway <neilc@samurai.com> writes:
> Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net> writes:
>> I think we had previously decided that we will not allow a random user
>> off the street to file bug reports into whatever system we end up
>> using.

> Uh, why not? (And more to the point, why raise the barrier to entry on
> reporting bugs?)

Our first try at a bug tracking system, several years ago, was open to
anybody to create entries, and we found that the signal-to-noise ratio
went to zero in no time.  Too many not-a-bugs, too many support
requests, too few actual bugs.  We went back to using the pgsql-bugs
mailing list.

It could be that in the intervening time, people have gotten used to bug
trackers because of their availability on other projects.  If so, we
might find a better grade of reports coming in.  I'm not very optimistic
about that though.

As for raising the barrier, you can presently submit bug reports to
pgsql-bugs by either mail or webform.  Most of the bug trackers I'm
aware of are webform-only.  I don't consider that a step forward,
especially since a webform isn't very conducive to making good reports
(it's hard to attach test cases, for instance).

            regards, tom lane

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Greg Stark
Date:
Subject: Re: [pgsql-www] Collaboration Tool Proposal
Next
From: Greg Stark
Date:
Subject: Re: Tablespaces