Re: port/snprintf.c (was Re: Numeric 508 datatype) - Mailing list pgsql-patches

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: port/snprintf.c (was Re: Numeric 508 datatype)
Date
Msg-id 16812.1133756185@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: port/snprintf.c (was Re: Numeric 508 datatype)  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Responses Re: port/snprintf.c (was Re: Numeric 508 datatype)  (Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>)
List pgsql-patches
I wrote:
> Hm.  One of the main problems I found was incorrect results for
> LONGLONG_MIN (-2^63).  I'm rather tempted to add a test case for
> that to the int8 regression test and see if any platforms fail ;-)

Done ... let me know whether the back branches still pass regression
for you ;-)

            regards, tom lane

pgsql-patches by date:

Previous
From: "Sergey E. Koposov"
Date:
Subject: Re: TODO item -- Improve psql's handling of multi-line
Next
From: "Sergey E. Koposov"
Date:
Subject: Re: psql, tab completion additions