Re: postgres_fdw vs. force_parallel_mode on ppc - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: postgres_fdw vs. force_parallel_mode on ppc
Date
Msg-id 16754.1456173408@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: postgres_fdw vs. force_parallel_mode on ppc  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Responses Re: postgres_fdw vs. force_parallel_mode on ppc
List pgsql-hackers
Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> writes:
>> Foreign tables are supposed to be categorically excluded from
>> parallelism.  Not sure why that's not working in this instance.

BTW, I wonder where you think that's supposed to be enforced, because
I sure can't find any such logic.

I suppose that has_parallel_hazard() would be the logical place to
notice foreign tables, but it currently doesn't even visit RTEs,
much less contain any code to check if their tables are foreign.
Or did you have another place in mind to do that?
        regards, tom lane



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Fabien COELHO
Date:
Subject: Re: checkpointer continuous flushing - V18
Next
From: Álvaro Hernández Tortosa
Date:
Subject: Re: about google summer of code 2016