Re: INS/UPD/DEL RETURNING for 8.2 - Mailing list pgsql-patches

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: INS/UPD/DEL RETURNING for 8.2
Date
Msg-id 16710.1141349622@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to INS/UPD/DEL RETURNING for 8.2  ("Jonah H. Harris" <jonah.harris@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: INS/UPD/DEL RETURNING for 8.2
List pgsql-patches
"Jonah H. Harris" <jonah.harris@gmail.com> writes:
> INSERT/UPDATE/DELETE seem to work fine in normal operation but there is an
> error with DELETE RETURNING when used through PL/pgSQL.

Probably other places too.  I don't see any provision here for ensuring
that the variables used in the RETURNING list are actually computed by
the plan.  This would be masked in the INSERT and non-join UPDATE cases
by the fact that the plan has to compute all columns of the target table
anyway ... but in a DELETE it'd be an issue.

I think set-returning functions in the RETURNING list might give you
some fits too ...

            regards, tom lane

pgsql-patches by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: INS/UPD/DEL RETURNING for 8.2
Next
From: "Jonah H. Harris"
Date:
Subject: Re: INS/UPD/DEL RETURNING for 8.2