Re: Call for platforms - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: Call for platforms
Date
Msg-id 16705.985327686@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Call for platforms  (Tatsuo Ishii <t-ishii@sra.co.jp>)
Responses Re: Call for platforms  (Tatsuo Ishii <t-ishii@sra.co.jp>)
Re: Call for platforms  (Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net>)
List pgsql-hackers
Tatsuo Ishii <t-ishii@sra.co.jp> writes:
> For the regression test, I got 7 failures, most of them seem harmless,
> the only concern I have is bit test though.

Most of the diffs derive from what I recall to be a known SunOS problem,
that strtol fails to notice overflow.  A value that should be rejected
is getting inserted into int4_tbl (mod 2^32 of course).

The bit test diffs seem to indicate that bit_cmp is messed up.  That
depends on memcmp.  I seem to recall something about memcmp not being
8-bit-clean on SunOS ... does that ring a bell with anyone?
        regards, tom lane


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tatsuo Ishii
Date:
Subject: Re: Call for platforms
Next
From: Thomas Lockhart
Date:
Subject: Re: Call for platforms