Re: signed short fd - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From pgsql@mohawksoft.com
Subject Re: signed short fd
Date
Msg-id 16674.24.91.171.78.1110803900.squirrel@mail.mohawksoft.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: signed short fd  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Responses Re: signed short fd
List pgsql-hackers
>
>> Maybe we make the assumption that all OS will
>> implement "fd" as an array index
>
> The POSIX spec requires open() to assign fd's consecutively from zero.
> http://www.opengroup.org/onlinepubs/007908799/xsh/open.html

With all due respect, PostgreSQL now runs natively on Win32. Having a
POSIX-only mentality, especially with something so trivial, is a mistake.
I would say "int" is the best way to handle it. You just *never* know.


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Greg Stark
Date:
Subject: Re: [BUGS] We are not following the spec for HAVING without GROUP
Next
From: Manfred Koizar
Date:
Subject: Re: We are not following the spec for HAVING without GROUP