Re: AW: AW: AW: WAL does not recover gracefully from ou t-of -dis k-sp ace - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: AW: AW: AW: WAL does not recover gracefully from ou t-of -dis k-sp ace
Date
Msg-id 16551.984240728@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: AW: AW: AW: WAL does not recover gracefully from ou t-of -dis k-sp ace  (Denis Perchine <dyp@perchine.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
Denis Perchine <dyp@perchine.com> writes:
> On Saturday 10 March 2001 08:41, Tom Lane wrote:
>> More numbers, these from a Powerbook G3 laptop running Linux 2.2:

> Eeegghhh. Sorry... But where did you get O_DSYNC on Linux?????

> bits/fcntl.h: # define O_DSYNC      O_SYNC

Hm, must be.  Okay, so those two sets of numbers should be taken as
fsync() and O_SYNC respectively.  Still the conclusion seems pretty
clear: the open() options are way more efficient than calling fsync()
separately.
        regards, tom lane


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: Interesting failure mode for initdb
Next
From: ncm@zembu.com (Nathan Myers)
Date:
Subject: doxygen & PG