Re: Really out of memory? - Mailing list pgsql-general

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: Really out of memory?
Date
Msg-id 16518.1243968343@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Really out of memory?  (Ben Chobot <bench@silentmedia.com>)
Responses Re: Really out of memory?
List pgsql-general
Ben Chobot <bench@silentmedia.com> writes:
> May 31 02:59:40 sfmelwss postgres[30103]: [1-1] ERROR:  out of memory
> May 31 02:59:40 sfmelwss postgres[30103]: [1-2] DETAIL:  Failed on request of size 16777212.

So the kernel isn't letting PG have any more memory.

> That seems pretty self-explainitory. But I'm not so sure, because SAR
> says:
> ...
> ...which indicates there was still plenty of space left in swap.

Which the kernel isn't letting us use.  Check the "ulimit" settings
that the postmaster is being started with.  On a Linux box, any of
the -d -m or -v settings might cause this.

It's possible you are running out of 32-bit address space in the backend
process, but what seems more likely is that the per-process ulimit is
unreasonably small.

            regards, tom lane

pgsql-general by date:

Previous
From: Ben Chobot
Date:
Subject: Re: Really out of memory?
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: Change view definition - do not have to drop it