Re: Allowing printf("%m") only where it actually works - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: Allowing printf("%m") only where it actually works
Date
Msg-id 16479.1534085343@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Allowing printf("%m") only where it actually works  (Fabien COELHO <coelho@cri.ensmp.fr>)
Responses Re: Allowing printf("%m") only where it actually works
List pgsql-hackers
Fabien COELHO <coelho@cri.ensmp.fr> writes:
> Indeed, there are hundreds of warnings around "pg_printf_attribute_m" 
> added with gcc 7.3.0 on by ubuntu 18.04 laptop, thanks to 3a60c8ff.

Oh?  What warnings exactly?  I would not expect any new warnings except
on platforms where gcc believes the local printf is non POSIX compliant,
which certainly ought not happen on any non-obsolete Linux.

            regards, tom lane


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Mikael Kjellström
Date:
Subject: Re: NetBSD vs libxml2
Next
From: Arseny Sher
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] logical decoding of two-phase transactions