Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net> writes:
> On mån, 2010-01-11 at 10:44 -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
>> I think you could probably use the existing tag field; no need for a new
>> one.
> Sorry, which tag field are you referring to?
The one called "tag" in the source code. It prints out as "Name":
--
-- Name: binary_coercible(oid, oid); Type: FUNCTION; Schema: public; Owner: postgres ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
--
regards, tom lane
