> Mark Woodward wrote:
>> Don't get me wrong, DNS, as it is designed, is PERFECT for the
>> distributed nature of the internet, but replication of fairly static
>> data under the control of a central authority (the admin) is better.
>
> What about this zeroconf/bonjour stuff? I'm not familiar with it, but
> it sounds like it could tie into this discussion.
>
Perhaps zeroconf is useful for stuff like thin clients, but I'm not sure
that it introduces anything into this discussion.
