Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> writes:
> On Tue, Jul 8, 2014 at 5:40 PM, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
>> Moshe Jacobson <moshe@neadwerx.com> writes:
>>> On Tue, Jul 8, 2014 at 4:40 PM, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
>>>> No. There is nothing about GROUP BY in the join removal logic.
>>> OK. Thank you. Is this something that would make sense to add?
>> Dunno. I don't recall any previous requests for such a thing, so I'd not
>> be inclined to add it unless it can be done very cheaply (in terms of both
>> code and runtime).
> I thought this was exactly what was being discussed on the "Allowing
> join removals for more join types" thread.
No, this is a completely different thing. The idea is that if the query
is grouping on outer-relation columns, you don't need to care if the inner
relation is unique or not, because it doesn't matter if there are multiple
matches.
regards, tom lane
