Arthur Zakirov <a.zakirov@postgrespro.ru> writes:
> On Thu, Apr 12, 2018 at 06:14:03PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
>> But I see from the code coverage report that this bit is unexercised
>> in the regression tests. Any chance of getting a test that covers
>> this? I'm worried that this means we also lack any coverage of
>> cases where the CompoundAffix array has more than one entry.
> I attached the patch. It fixes the following:
> - show an error if actual number of affix aliases is greater than
> initial number. I wonder is it necessary. But I think it is better to
> raise an error than crash, if you set wrong number for AF flag.
Good idea, but I tweaked the message wording a bit.
> The code coverage still isn't 100% for spell.c. But it is better than
> earlier.
Indeed. Pushed, thanks!
regards, tom lane
