Thomas Munro <thomas.munro@enterprisedb.com> writes:
> Thanks for taking a look at this. I don't want my attempt to steer things
> in a more conservative direction to result in the original complaint not
> being fixed, so how about considering just this change to start.sgml for
> now:
> <para>
> Possibly, your site administrator has already created a database
> - for your use. He should have told you what the name of your
> + for your use and told you what the name of your
> database is. In that case you can omit this step and skip ahead
> to the next section.
> </para>
That would work, but I still wonder why we need that second sentence
at all.
regards, tom lane
