Peter Eisentraut <peter@eisentraut.org> writes:
> On 30.08.25 18:52, Tom Lane wrote:
>> I suppose that the expectation is that every release note item
>> will be credited to someone. Why does this item lack a credit?
> Maybe I'm understanding this differently, but the "Migration" section
> ought to be advice about the migration, which is not a place to
> communicate credit. In the case I added, the item is the result of some
> changes that are already listed and credited elsewhere in the "Changes"
> section.
One answer could be to remove the commit-details comment block from
that item, thereby making the added URL go away too. However, that
will look a bit odd when the neighboring items all have credits and
URLs.
I think our past practice has been to list any one item either in
Migration or the following sections, not in both places. This item
seems to adhere to that too: I don't see that commit hash anywhere
else. So I'm not clear why you're finding this duplicative?
regards, tom lane
