Re: alter + preserving dependencies - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: alter + preserving dependencies
Date
Msg-id 16334.1210095842@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: alter + preserving dependencies  (Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net>)
Responses Re: alter + preserving dependencies  (Dimitri Fontaine <dim@hi-media.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net> writes:
> Josh Berkus wrote:
>> I don't follow you.  I can currently add a column, without breaking 
>> either foriegn keys or inheritance.  What's the problem?

> not for a view at least.

Yeah, the restrictions on replacing a view definition date from before
we had any fancy ALTER TABLE stuff.  They could probably use a re-visit.
        regards, tom lane


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Andrew Dunstan
Date:
Subject: Re: alter + preserving dependencies
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: [0/4] Proposal of SE-PostgreSQL patches