That would be me.
Lots more work to be done on domains yet though (foreign keys, check
constraints, etc.), but those will have to come in some other weekend.
I think you'll really enjoy my next patch (should be submitted soon).
If it goes through it'll make your life quite a bit easier -- then
again, maybe not.
--
Rod Taylor
----- Original Message -----
From: "Dave Page" <dpage@vale-housing.co.uk>
To: "'Rod Taylor'" <rbt@zort.ca>; <pgadmin-hackers@postgresql.org>
Cc: "'Frank_Lupo'" <frank_lupo@email.it>
Sent: Friday, April 05, 2002 11:27 AM
Subject: RE: [pgadmin-hackers] RFD: PostgreSQL Schema Support
> BTW Rod, I forgot to mention, thanks for the Domain support in 7.3
(I assume
> you're the only Rod Taylor around here). A nice feature - I'm just
finishing
> adding support to pgAdmin...
>
> Note to Frank Lupo: Domains implement what the patch to pgAdmin that
you
> sent me did, only in PostgreSQL itself. Not particuarly obvious from
the
> name though :-(
>
> Regards, Dave.
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Dave Page [mailto:dpage@vale-housing.co.uk]
> > Sent: 05 April 2002 15:44
> > To: 'Rod Taylor'; pgadmin-hackers@postgresql.org
> > Subject: Re: [pgadmin-hackers] RFD: PostgreSQL Schema Support
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: Rod Taylor [mailto:rbt@zort.ca]
> > > Sent: 05 April 2002 15:34
> > > To: Dave Page; pgadmin-hackers@postgresql.org
> > > Subject: Re: [pgadmin-hackers] RFD: PostgreSQL Schema Support
> > >
> > >
> > > Option 2 is certainly the best long term. A couple of
> > > releases from now and very few people will be using 7.2 or
> > > prior -- and they should expect newer tools to be broken .
> > >
> > > Support namespaces in the cleanest way possible, and
> > > potentially add a temporary hack (for the length of 7.3.x
> > > releases and maybe part of
> > > 7.4) to support 7.2 and prior with a 'pg_public' or default
> > > namespace. ie. Pretend a namespace exists for public stuff,
> > > as when they upgrade to 7.3 that would be where it all ends
> > > up (I think), so it's somwhat appropriate.
> >
> > It sounds so obvious - I'm gutted I didn't think of that myself
:-).
> >
> > Thanks Rod.
> >
> > Dave.
> >
> > ---------------------------(end of
> > broadcast)---------------------------
> > TIP 5: Have you checked our extensive FAQ?
> >
> http://www.postgresql.org/users-lounge/docs/faq.html
>
