Re: Is there really no interest in SQL Standard? - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: Is there really no interest in SQL Standard?
Date
Msg-id 16304.1316364212@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Is there really no interest in SQL Standard?  (Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net>)
Responses Re: Is there really no interest in SQL Standard?
Re: Is there really no interest in SQL Standard?
List pgsql-hackers
Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net> writes:
> On sön, 2011-09-18 at 09:45 -0500, Dave Page wrote:
>> That is much more reasonable, though unfortunately not what was said.
>> Regardless, I stand by my main point that such a representative should
>> be communicating with the project regularly. Having a rep who works
>> outside the project is of no use at all. 

> Well, the point of this thread is, how can she communicate?

+1 for a closed mailing list.  It's a bit annoying to have to do such
a thing, but it's not like we haven't got other closed lists for
appropriate purposes.  I guess the real question is, exactly what will
be the requirements for joining?
        regards, tom lane


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: /proc/self/oom_adj is deprecated in newer Linux kernels
Next
From: David Rinaldi
Date:
Subject: Grouping Sets