Re: Variadic polymorpic functions - Mailing list pgsql-general

From Pavel Stehule
Subject Re: Variadic polymorpic functions
Date
Msg-id 162867791001270805mbf43d35o424eef311ed52f2@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Variadic polymorpic functions  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-general
2010/1/27 Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>:
> Vincenzo Romano <vincenzo.romano@notorand.it> writes:
>> But why still on  separate schema?
>> I'd rather put them all in the public one, so you don't need the "pst." anymore.
>> Just like (most of) all other contrib mudules ...
>
> If this were to get committed, it would definitely get made to look just
> like all the other contrib modules; so forget the separate schema.
>

I have not problem with it. Code to contrib module can be more
modificated. Current code is for pgfoundry and I prefer some
separation.

regards
Pavel

> But what I'm wondering is whether it should be contrib or in core.
> Is there some potential reason why someone might not want it installed?
>

>                        regards, tom lane
>

pgsql-general by date:

Previous
From: Vincenzo Romano
Date:
Subject: Re: Variadic polymorpic functions
Next
From: Vincenzo Romano
Date:
Subject: Re: Variadic polymorpic functions