Hello
2008/8/15 Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net>:
> Am Friday, 15. August 2008 schrieb Tom Lane:
>> Hannu Krosing <hannu@2ndQuadrant.com> writes:
>> > How is this supposed to interact with argument names ?
>>
>> Yeah, the real problem with this proposal is that it conscripts a syntax
>> that we'll probably want to use in the future for argument-name-based
>> parameter matching. The proposed behavior is not nearly as useful as
>> that would be.
>
> I am not at all convinced about the proposed feature, but is that really a
> syntax we would use for function calls with named parameters?
>
> Random googling shows me that Oracle appears to use a syntax like
>
> name => value
>
I vote this syntax too. So this second feature - named params X labels
for params. Labels for params is related to my work on variadic
functions. Named params needs default param's values - and some more
of changes in parser. Somebody have to solve conflict between params
and expression.
Pavel
> This is actually a feature that I would like to see implemented soonish, so if
> anyone has input on the possible syntax consequences, please comment.
>
