Re: DISTINCT -> GROUP BY - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Pavel Stehule
Subject Re: DISTINCT -> GROUP BY
Date
Msg-id 162867790806030636p17d6f9b4g8f65f3ed42dbf969@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to DISTINCT -> GROUP BY  (David Fetter <david@fetter.org>)
Responses Re: DISTINCT -> GROUP BY  (David Fetter <david@fetter.org>)
List pgsql-hackers
Hello David

http://www.postgresql.org/docs/faqs.TODO.html

Consider using hash buckets to do DISTINCT, rather than sorting
This would be beneficial when there are few distinct values. This is
already used by GROUP BY.

Regards
Pavel Stehule

2008/6/3 David Fetter <david@fetter.org>:
> Folks,
>
> I've noticed that queries of the form
>
> SELECT DISTNCT foo, bar, baz
> FROM quux
> WHERE ...
>
> perform significantly worse than the equivalent using GROUP BY.
>
> SELECT foo, bar, baz
> FROM quux
> WHERE ...
> GROUP BY foo, bar, baz
>
> Where would I start looking in order to make them actually equivalent
> from the planner's point of view?  Also, would back-patching this make
> sense?  It doesn't change any APIs, but it does make some queries go
> faster.
>
> Cheers,
> David.
> --
> David Fetter <david@fetter.org> http://fetter.org/
> Phone: +1 415 235 3778  AIM: dfetter666  Yahoo!: dfetter
> Skype: davidfetter      XMPP: david.fetter@gmail.com
>
> Remember to vote!
> Consider donating to Postgres: http://www.postgresql.org/about/donate
>
> --
> Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
> To make changes to your subscription:
> http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
>


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: David Fetter
Date:
Subject: DISTINCT -> GROUP BY
Next
From: David Fetter
Date:
Subject: Re: DISTINCT -> GROUP BY