Re: (Never?) Kill Postmaster? - Mailing list pgsql-general

From Pavel Stehule
Subject Re: (Never?) Kill Postmaster?
Date
Msg-id 162867790710240023q6bf8bae6pa527a4bf7a5c311d@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: (Never?) Kill Postmaster?  (Christian Schröder <cs@deriva.de>)
List pgsql-general
2007/10/24, Christian Schröder <cs@deriva.de>:
> Ow Mun Heng wrote:
> > look for the query's procpid and then issue a select
> > pg_cancel_backend('the_id')
> >
>
> Does it do any harm if I kill (either with signal 9 or signal 15) the
> single backend process (and not the postmaster)?
>

shared memory can be broken, and probably somewhere can stay some
garbage. It's depend on query.

Pavel


> Regards,
>     Christian
>
> --
> Deriva GmbH                         Tel.: +49 551 489500-42
> Financial IT and Consulting         Fax:  +49 551 489500-91
> Hans-Böckler-Straße 2                  http://www.deriva.de
> D-37079 Göttingen
>
> Deriva CA Certificate: http://www.deriva.de/deriva-ca.cer
>
>
> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 2: Don't 'kill -9' the postmaster
>

pgsql-general by date:

Previous
From: "Michael Harris"
Date:
Subject: Re: (Never?) Kill Postmaster?
Next
From: Gábor Farkas
Date:
Subject: deadlock detected, only selects (not select-for-update)