Re: plpgsql and qualified variable names - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Pavel Stehule
Subject Re: plpgsql and qualified variable names
Date
Msg-id 162867790707152254v4176cb30xfd3848ffc38b7661@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: plpgsql and qualified variable names  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-hackers
> Anyway it seems like this whole area is a research project for 8.4
> or later, not something we should try to fix now.  But having said
> that, there didn't seem to be any objection to the idea of changing
> the outer block (where function parameters are declared) to be labeled
> with the function name, instead of having no label as at present.
> Does anyone think we should not do that for 8.3?
>

I am for 8.3

Regards
Pavel Stehule


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: plpgsql and qualified variable names
Next
From: Andrew Dunstan
Date:
Subject: Re: write_pipe_chunks patch messes up early error message output