Re: greatest/least semantics different between oracle and postgres - Mailing list pgsql-general

From Pavel Stehule
Subject Re: greatest/least semantics different between oracle and postgres
Date
Msg-id 162867790706300029n5d60bf86r3c160e6509393607@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to greatest/least semantics different between oracle and postgres  (Bruno Wolff III <bruno@wolff.to>)
Responses Re: greatest/least semantics different between oracle and postgres  (Bruno Wolff III <bruno@wolff.to>)
List pgsql-general
Hello,

I have not Oracle, so I cannot test it, but PostgreSQL implementation
respect Oracle:

http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-patches/2005-06/msg00431.php

Regards
Pavel Stehule

2007/6/30, Bruno Wolff III <bruno@wolff.to>:
> The following is just FYI.
> I was recently doing some stuff with greatest() on oracle (9.2.0.8.0) and
> noticed that it returned null if ANY of the arguments were null. Out of
> curiosity I checked postgres' definition of that function and found that it
> returns null only if ALL of the arguments are null.
>
> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 1: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate
>        subscribe-nomail command to majordomo@postgresql.org so that your
>        message can get through to the mailing list cleanly
>

pgsql-general by date:

Previous
From: "paul rivers"
Date:
Subject: Re: greatest/least semantics different between oracle and postgres
Next
From: "Pavel Stehule"
Date:
Subject: Re: How does one impolement lists, or arrays, pin pl/pgsql ?