Re: Memory usage per postmaster process - Mailing list pgsql-general

From Grzegorz Tańczyk
Subject Re: Memory usage per postmaster process
Date
Msg-id 16269363.1371383472862009.JavaMail.root@Polzone
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [100% SPAM] Re: Memory usage per postmaster process  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Responses Re: Memory usage per postmaster process
List pgsql-general
On 11/02/2013 08:47 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
Author: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Branch: master Release: REL9_1_BR [3e5f9412d] 2010-10-06 19:31:05 -0400
   Reduce the memory requirement for large ispell dictionaries.
I checked this patch:
http://www.postgresql.org/message-id/AANLkTi=4fUi1zoFMpZ==Yf14RJDv_G1xgAkVQMDyEtBk@mail.gmail.com

I can't find it here:
http://doxygen.postgresql.org/spell_8c_source.html

I also don't see those changes in 9.3.1 source. Status in commitfest list is " Committed". I can't see hold_memory anywhere.

If you're not using ispell, it's not relevant, and I'm not sure whether
the savings were significant for anything but Czech.
I am using ispell.

Thanks

--
Regards,
  Grzegorz

pgsql-general by date:

Previous
From: David Johnston
Date:
Subject: Re: How can I run a PostgreSQL database outside /var/run/postgresql?
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: Memory usage per postmaster process