Re: \d+ for long view definitions? - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: \d+ for long view definitions?
Date
Msg-id 1626.1251750059@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: \d+ for long view definitions?  (Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net>)
List pgsql-hackers
Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net> writes:
> On sön, 2009-08-30 at 18:43 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
>> Seems like a more general answer would be
>> for \d output to go through the pager ...

> That should also be fixed, but I'm not sure if it really does it for me.

Why not?  Just quit out of the pager when you've seen enough.

If the view definition precedes other data that is deemed more
important, then we'd need to adjust the ordering, but I'm not
entirely seeing the point of having to suppress the definition.

I especially don't like the thought of making it depend on the length
of the definition.  I would prefer \d not showing it at all.
        regards, tom lane


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: "Kevin Grittner"
Date:
Subject: Re: Linux LSB init script
Next
From: Peter Eisentraut
Date:
Subject: Re: 8.5 release timetable, again