Re: restore time: sort_mem vs. checkpoing_segments - Mailing list pgsql-performance

From Vivek Khera
Subject Re: restore time: sort_mem vs. checkpoing_segments
Date
Msg-id 16239.22770.504961.514819@yertle.int.kciLink.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: restore time: sort_mem vs. checkpoing_segments  (Robert Treat <xzilla@users.sourceforge.net>)
List pgsql-performance
>>>>> "RT" == Robert Treat <xzilla@users.sourceforge.net> writes:

RT> hmm... i wonder what would happen if you pushed your sort_mem higher...
RT> on some of our development boxes and upgrade scripts, i push the
RT> sort_mem to 102400 and sometimes even higher depending on the box. this
RT> really speeds up my restores quit a bit (and is generally safe as i make
RT> sure there isn't any other activity going on at the time)

I was just checking, and I already ran test with larger sort_mem.  the
checkpoint segments made more of a difference...

pgsql-performance by date:

Previous
From: Garrett Bladow
Date:
Subject: LIKE query running slow
Next
From: Bruce Momjian
Date:
Subject: Re: restore time: sort_mem vs. checkpoing_segments