Foreign Keys being able to reference same table not spelled out in documentation - Mailing list pgsql-docs

From PG Doc comments form
Subject Foreign Keys being able to reference same table not spelled out in documentation
Date
Msg-id 161969805833.690.13680986983883602407@wrigleys.postgresql.org
Whole thread Raw
Responses Re: Foreign Keys being able to reference same table not spelled out in documentation  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-docs
The following documentation comment has been logged on the website:

Page: https://www.postgresql.org/docs/13/ddl-constraints.html
Description:

Hello,
In Section 5.4.5 of the documentation regarding Foreign Key Constraints it
is stated
"A foreign key constraint specifies that the values [...] must match the
values appearing in some row of another table."
But referencing the same table is allowed and necessary for tree-like
structures.

For comparison, the MariaDB documentation states "The parent and the child
table [...] can be the same table."
While the SQLite-documentation is not clear on whether this would be allowed
or not, it doesn't spell out that both tables need to be different either.
MSSQL documentation states "FOREIGN KEY constraints can reference another
column in the same table, and is referred to as a self-reference."

I always urge my students to use the documentation as reference instead of
blindly googling and the task they had was building a tree-like
data-structure (specifically a heap, enforcing the heap-property via CHECK)
and they were thoroughly confused, that the concept of foreign-keys would
extend in this manner, as it was a little bit hidden in the lecture. As they
didn't find it to be allowed by documentation, they thought it wouldn't
be.

Hopefully this can be added somewhere.

pgsql-docs by date:

Previous
From: Pavel Stehule
Date:
Subject: Re: pl/pgsql errors when multi-dimensional arrays are used
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: pl/pgsql errors when multi-dimensional arrays are used