Re: rc1 tarball contains partially outdated/missing man pages - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: rc1 tarball contains partially outdated/missing man pages
Date
Msg-id 16182.1245356153@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: rc1 tarball contains partially outdated/missing man pages  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Responses Re: rc1 tarball contains partially outdated/missing man pages  (Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net>)
List pgsql-hackers
I wrote:
> One thing I notice is that the "table" and "with" entries are not coming
> out as intended.  The file names are all caps:

> -rw-r--r--   1 tgl        users           18 Jun 12 01:37 WITH.7
> -rw-r--r--   1 tgl        users           18 Jun 12 01:37 TABLE.7

> and the content surely isn't what was meant:

> $ more TABLE.7
> .so man7/SELECT.7
> $ more WITH.7
> .so man7/SELECT.7

BTW, as far as that particular point goes: maybe we could fix the tools
issues underlying this, but I'm tempted to think that it's not worth the
trouble, because making these man pages be aliases for SELECT is just
the Wrong Thing anyway.  I think we should just split them off and have
them be documented as separate top-level reference pages.  Doing that
for TABLE is clearly fairly sensible; and as for WITH, the current
approach is going to fail miserably anyhow as soon as we allow WITH
to be prefixed to INSERT/UPDATE/DELETE.  Which is something that was
already requested, and I see no semantic or implementation reason not
to allow (in 8.5 of course, not now).  So I'm thinking we make a man
page for WITH as such, and cross-reference it from SELECT, moving the
current discussion of CTEs over.
        regards, tom lane


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: rc1 tarball contains partially outdated/missing man pages
Next
From: Stefan Kaltenbrunner
Date:
Subject: 8.4 open item: copy performance regression?