On 10/21/16 7:43 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
> Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@2ndquadrant.com> writes:
>> Jim Nasby wrote:
>>> It occurs to me that it might be worth embedding the relation name in the
>>> free space of the first block. Most people would never notice the missing 64
>>> bytes, but it would be incredibly helpful in cases like this...
>
>> Agreed. The problem is how to install it without breaking pg_upgrade.
It can't look up relation names?
> Well, that's the first problem. The second problem is how to cope with
> RENAME TABLE.
If the name was only encoded in the first block of the relation I'm not
sure how bad this would be; are there any facilities to change the name
back on a rollback?
--
Jim Nasby, Data Architect, Blue Treble Consulting, Austin TX
Experts in Analytics, Data Architecture and PostgreSQL
Data in Trouble? Get it in Treble! http://BlueTreble.com
855-TREBLE2 (855-873-2532) mobile: 512-569-9461
