On February 1, 2018 17:16:08 "David G. Johnston" <david.g.johnston@gmail.com> wrote:
>> Bug reference: 15044
>
> It seems the work-around is to not use "for all tables" in your publication
> definition.
Indeed. My real world case 700+ tables with semi regular additions and two materialized views so ALL TABLES was the right fit.
> As described it does seem bugged. The table matview itself is not being
> published, as documented, but knowledge of its existence as part of the
> publication is...
Exactly. The matview does not show up in pg_publication_tables but it's registered at some level.