feichanghong <feichanghong@qq.com> writes:
> Thanks for the analysis! v04-0002 looks fine to me — please just apply it on
> HEAD.
Done that way.
I thought a bit about your suggestion of adding some kind of
assertion check for memory leaks, but it looks too messy and
specialized as-is. Maybe with reflection we can find a more
generic idea.
regards, tom lane
