"Kevin Grittner" <Kevin.Grittner@wicourts.gov> writes:
> Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> wrote:
>> I think the big issue is that having standard_conforming_strings
>> affect function behavior introduces the same problems we have had in
>> the past of having a GUC affect function behavior.
> Can't that be managed with this CREATE FUNCTION option?:
> SET configuration_parameter { TO value | = value | FROM CURRENT }
It can be, the question is whether we're prepared to break everything
under the sun until people add that.
regards, tom lane
