Re: pg_stat_statements oddity with track = all - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From legrand legrand
Subject Re: pg_stat_statements oddity with track = all
Date
Msg-id 1606983372910-0.post@n3.nabble.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: pg_stat_statements oddity with track = all  (Julien Rouhaud <rjuju123@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: pg_stat_statements oddity with track = all
List pgsql-hackers
Hi Julien,

> The extra field I've proposed would increase the number of records, as it
> needs
to be a part of the key. 

To get an increase in the number of records that means that the same
statement 
would appear at top level AND nested level. This seems a corner case with
very low 
(neglectible) occurence rate. Did I miss something ?

Regards
PAscal 



--
Sent from: https://www.postgresql-archive.org/PostgreSQL-hackers-f1928748.html



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Kyotaro Horiguchi
Date:
Subject: Re: Huge memory consumption on partitioned table with FKs
Next
From: Kyotaro Horiguchi
Date:
Subject: Re: Huge memory consumption on partitioned table with FKs