Re: [NOVICE] WHERE clause not used when index is used - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: [NOVICE] WHERE clause not used when index is used
Date
Msg-id 16064.1456853141@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [NOVICE] WHERE clause not used when index is used  (Jeff Janes <jeff.janes@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: [NOVICE] WHERE clause not used when index is used  (Stephen Frost <sfrost@snowman.net>)
List pgsql-hackers
[ trimming -novice from the cc list ]

Jeff Janes <jeff.janes@gmail.com> writes:
> On Tue, Mar 1, 2016 at 7:40 AM, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
>> (Problem is reproducible in 9.5 and HEAD, but not 9.4.)

> Bisects down to:

> 606c0123d627b37d5ac3f7c2c97cd715dde7842f is the first bad commit
> commit 606c0123d627b37d5ac3f7c2c97cd715dde7842f
> Author: Simon Riggs <simon@2ndQuadrant.com>
> Date:   Tue Nov 18 10:24:55 2014 +0000

>     Reduce btree scan overhead for < and > strategies

Hmm ... just from the commit message, this seems much more likely to be
the cause than does the buffer locking patch Stephen fingered.  Stephen,
how'd you identify 2ed5b87f as being the problem?
        regards, tom lane



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Alvaro Herrera
Date:
Subject: Re: Confusing with commit time usage in logical decoding
Next
From: Petr Jelinek
Date:
Subject: Re: Confusing with commit time usage in logical decoding