Re: [PROPOSAL] Client Log Output Filtering - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: [PROPOSAL] Client Log Output Filtering
Date
Msg-id 16060.1459271563@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [PROPOSAL] Client Log Output Filtering  (Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>)
List pgsql-hackers
Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> writes:
> There's a number of cases during early startup/auth where we really
> don't want client to get messages.

Right, which we handle at present with ClientAuthInProgress.  But
I think it's worth drawing a distinction between "don't send message
to client because of the state we're in" and "don't send this message
to client because it's security-sensitive".  The latter is better
handled by annotations attached to specific ereport sites, the former
not.
        regards, tom lane



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Robert Haas
Date:
Subject: Re: Move PinBuffer and UnpinBuffer to atomics
Next
From: Andres Freund
Date:
Subject: Re: Move PinBuffer and UnpinBuffer to atomics