Michael Paquier <michael.paquier@gmail.com> writes:
> On Mon, Feb 27, 2017 at 10:12 AM, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
>> BTW ... can anyone explain to me the reason why we offer to complete
>> CREATE OBJECT with the names of existing objects of that kind?
> Isn't that to facilitate commands appended after CREATE SCHEMA? Say
> table foo is in schema1, and creating it in schema2 gets easier with
> tab completion?
Seems like pretty much of a stretch. I've never done anything like
that, have you?
regards, tom lane
