Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> writes:
> On Tue, Jan 13, 2015 at 8:16 PM, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
>> Not sure whether to just commit this to HEAD and call it a day, or to
>> risk back-patching.
> I think we need to back-patch something; that's a pretty nasty
> regression, and I have some EDB-internal reports that might be from
> the same cause.
OK. I went ahead and made the necessary code changes to avoid changing
the struct size in released branches, as per Heikki's idea.
regards, tom lane
