Re: SHMMAX seems entirely broken in OS X 10.4.2 - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: SHMMAX seems entirely broken in OS X 10.4.2
Date
Msg-id 16013.1125366092@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: SHMMAX seems entirely broken in OS X 10.4.2  ("Luke Lonergan" <llonergan@greenplum.com>)
Responses Re: SHMMAX seems entirely broken in OS X 10.4.2  ("Luke Lonergan" <llonergan@greenplum.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
"Luke Lonergan" <llonergan@greenplum.com> writes:
> Yes - it's very strange, I've had the same experience though I finally found
> that setting SHMMAX and SHMALL to the same values, namely 268435456, seems
> to work out fine.

Interesting.  I wonder if there's some bit of code that thinks that
SHMALL is measured in bytes (contrary to OSX's general convention
that it's measured in pages).
        regards, tom lane


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: lookup fail at DROP USER
Next
From: Jeff -
Date:
Subject: Re: SHMMAX seems entirely broken in OS X 10.4.2