Re: APR 1.0 released - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: APR 1.0 released
Date
Msg-id 16009.1094336024@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to APR 1.0 released  (Gaetano Mendola <mendola@bigfoot.com>)
Responses Re: APR 1.0 released
List pgsql-hackers
Gaetano Mendola <mendola@bigfoot.com> writes:
> now that Apache Portable Runtime was release why don't
> use it on Postgres?

The sense of the question is backwards.  Why *should* we use it?
        regards, tom lane


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: huge execution time difference with almost same plan
Next
From: Jaime Casanova
Date:
Subject: Adding columns in the middle of tables