Possible mistake in backup documentation - Mailing list pgsql-docs

From PG Doc comments form
Subject Possible mistake in backup documentation
Date
Msg-id 160078426053.14061.808669930112439771@wrigleys.postgresql.org
Whole thread Raw
Responses Re: Possible mistake in backup documentation  (Laurenz Albe <laurenz.albe@cybertec.at>)
List pgsql-docs
The following documentation comment has been logged on the website:

Page: https://www.postgresql.org/docs/12/wal.html
Description:

Hello!
In "25.3.3.2. Making An Exclusive Low-Level Backup", you said that "The
exclusive backup method is deprecated and should be avoided. Prior to
PostgreSQL 9.6, this was the only low-level method available, but it is now
recommended that all users upgrade their scripts to use non-exclusive
backups". But in the example in "25.3.6.1. Standalone Hot Backups" you use
the exclusive version of backup command. Is it a mistake or not?

pgsql-docs by date:

Previous
From: PG Doc comments form
Date:
Subject: Add support files
Next
From: "Hou, Zhijie"
Date:
Subject: fix typo in lo-examplesect.html